Monday, November 18, 2019

5-String Guitar Project

Mid-November, 2019  
Spoiler alert: possible heretical musings below.
Disclaimer: I probably need an editor.

Many players are probably aware of Keith Richards' use of open tuning, and that he has converted guitars dedicated to such tuning(s) with a string removed.
It took me too long to connect this particular solution with one of my own guitar-playing problems only (relatively) recently identified: I have fat fingers, making narrow neck guitars (even typical width) hard to play.
Note: I also have a rather large bass-playing hands, so a wider neck solution may not work for smaller hands, I don't know.

What do I mean by fat fingers? Everyone who tries to learn a stringed instrument will find that it takes time to learn precise finger placement. In the case of unfretted instruments you have to put your fingers in the right place for correct intonation, but I am talking about the other direction - placing a fingertip on the string in question such that it doesn't also damp adjacent strings.
My first quality guitar, a Gibson J-50 adjustable, has a rather narrow neck (40mm nut width) with correspondingly narrow string spacing but it never occurred to me that this was an impediment. Certainly I tried the wider neck of my brother's classical guitars but I suspect the lack of radius (among other factors) prevented those from feeling friendlier to my left hand. I'm a thumb-wrapper too, but these days that doesn't seem to be an issue on wide necks. 


Gibson (40mm nut)
Takamine (48mm nut)
Standard tuning C chord shape. My first finger cannot avoid the high E string on the Gibson. In fact my nail is damping the G string as well, whereas on the Tak the G and E strings can ring.
My right hand has it's own ongoing issues with the plectrum. It seems that starting largely self-taught I adopted a way of holding the pick that a teacher decades later identified as being some kind of bad (at least for rock strumming). I worked at that and as a result lost my original comfort - however limited it may have been. Over time my struggles forced me to become something of a hybrid finger-picker. I'll do some pseudo-flat-picking with a fingernail but not much with a flat pick as I always need to switch quickly back to finger picking. My hat is off to those who manage to somehow palm the pick for fingerpicking then get it magically back in position for more flat picking. Freaking magic. 
The point of all this is that I became slowly aware that wider string spacings (hence wider necks) were conducive to finger-picking. Of course the merest peek into the classical guitar world makes this glaringly obvious.

The Takamine EAN30C was my first wider neck guitar (48mm at nut) and remains a much-played favourite as the wider neck really delivers on the promise. It also features electronics, smaller-than-dreadnought body and a cutaway.  What's not to like?! Oddly enough the headstock is made to look like a classical even though it has steel strings. It also has a cedar top.
A more recent addition in my quest is the Seagull Agostino Peppino model, with a nut width of 1.9" (about 48mm). Great sounding guitar with spruce top, cutaway, electronics etc, however the modern dreadnought body may be why I play it less.
Without having to buy yet another guitar I took half of the strings off my old Japanese Epiphone 12-string: nut width 51mm, a joy to play! Love the smaller body (it's a Serenader) but sometimes miss the cutaway.

But what to do with all the guitars that have narrower necks? (I know - get rid of them and yes, I sold at least one.) 
Enter the five-string concept. Spacing 5 across the land formerly occupied by 6 strings yields a workable instrument for the fat-fingered man.

Note that attempting to play normal 6-string style in standard tuning with one string missing will be less than satisfying (unless you're very power chord oriented). Open tuning is a different story, although one already accustomed to 6 string open tuning will certainly notice the absence of a string.

I am by no means an expert on open tunings having confined most of my open tuning time to D or G, with a touch of DADGAD. These common tunings have much in common with banjo chords, so I'd say that anyone who plays banjo and guitar owes it to themselves to at least try open G or D on guitar, if you haven't already.

Have you tried to learn guitar but found it too difficult? Consider trying again with open tuning! I'd argue that open tuning can be a great way to get started, even with 6 strings.
Remember, John Lennon started by playing ukulele chords on guitar.
Most of my open playing chords are on the same 4 strings (other than the barre of course). I think many players only tune open for slide work, another universe to itself, but I rarely get around to that - so much to amuse me in the world of fretting.

These pictures are of my first experiment on a cheap plywood-top guitar.

First I removed the low E string and notched the nut to space the remaining 5 strings more evenly. Result: a quite playable guitar!

 Next I drilled some additional holes in the bridge to accommodate similarly spaced strings.

This is an ad-hoc clamp intended to support the bridge and bridge plate (internal) while drilling, to minimize splintering at entry/exit "wounds".

 Speaking of that plate, here's what it looks like inside the guitar.


 These were taken prior to acquiring the appropriate 3-degree reamer to give the holes the proper taper for the pins, why they're sticking out so far.

I'm thinking permanent change like this might involve plugging the unused holes for strength, those new holes got closer than I thought they'd be after reaming. But again, these are first time experiments on a cheapo guitar. 

Before                             After
Nut modified not bridge.     Both nut and bridge modified.

Thanks to my old buddy Mark Dodge for suggesting a picture taken from same angle as that first picture.
After thought: I said I wouldn't consider hacking up my Gibson for such a project, but after failing to play a clean C chord on it I found myself staring at the bridge wondering about a less invasive method. Why not just drill some very small holes (big enough for the strings to pass through) here, here and here? 
Hmm. Notion shown above on the junk guitar.

The Gibson bridge doesn't look quite so forgiving of such an idea, but further pondering suggests only drilling the center hole and using existing holds for strings 2 and 4. Still, I'm reluctant, quite apart from the inconvenience added to string-changing. On the other hand, many people replace the klunky adjustable bridges on these old classics and my local luthier Roger Thurman pointed out (after one glance) that this particular bridge is askew anyway, explaining tuning problems I'd had through the years! Maybe my fat fingers can ride this old Gibson again after all.

Update: The Gibson shall ride!
Coming soon, mock-up of improved solution requiring NO NEW HOLES. 


Furthermore:
I am thinking this opens up a lot of possibilities for double-neck guitars. I have more than one with usable bass but a too-narrow-necked 6-string. Stay tuned! 

Kindwhile, if enough folks read this I can eventually hear someone saying: "But WTH can I play in this open tuning? What good is it?"
Examples abound, many (if not all?) songs on Dylan's Blood On The Tracks for starters. 

I'll unabashedly submit one of my own too, a humble unfinished demo from a few years back that doesn't even have a proper name yet. 
Thanks to Alan Nemeth whose drum samples I cut/pasted for the (too loud) drum track, and childhood friend Tony Thorne-Booth for the lovely keyboard contributions (not loud enough).
Fool disclosure: that was done with 6-string open D tuning (but I'm adapting it to 5-string with not too much fussing). For sure there are plenty of tunes that would be lacking on 5 strings instead of 6.

Bottom line: maybe I should just look into digital liposuction.

One Large Pizza Box & Some Hot Glue

Mid-November, 2019

I supposed another essential ingredient was a little spare time.

Our kitchen rubbish bin was unfashionably hatless, but no more.
The wise man might simply get hence* to a purveyor and secure a new item, perhaps with foot-operated mechanism (every solution creates a problem), but not me. 
Not today anyway.  



Thanks to Carol M. for the pizza, the leftovers were good too! 

*The high-tech wise man might just order online.

Sunday, August 11, 2019

Cecropia!

August 10, Cecropia Caterpillar


The adventure begins at 3:20 of this video, on my foot.



We've raised Luna moths, and a Polyphemus (long ago) but this must surely be the biggest cat I have ever seen. In this pose he/she's 57 zipper links or 23 stitches long, which approaches 3.5". This is a bit unscientific as I can't match up the picture to the exact spot on that insulated bag.

August 11 9am, the web is happening. 
First time-lapse is about 10 minutes of getting started.
11 hours later he/she's still busy in there (about 8 minutes worth).
 I don't think we'll get much of a view when actual pupa happens.

Aug 14 
Today I am told the moth itself may not emerge until next spring.

Wednesday, July 3, 2019

Monarchs 2019

Milkweed patch started in 2018, looking good in 2019 but no flowers other than Nancy (as of July 3).

 
May 27 witnessed a Monarch lingering, checked and found eggs.

Eggs hatched June 2 but only found a few tiny caterpillars, this one might be a day or two old. Photographed June 3.


What goes in must come out. Yes the camera is tilted.
June 21
June 23 This one is more interested in stem than leaf at this point, wants fiber I guess.
 June 24 Cha-cha-changes...  Cat#1
June 25 Cat#2 decided to attach to a piece of newspaper lining the enclosure.


Slideshow of photos taken every ten minutes. Clearly that period was too long to catch much of the actual transformation. I consider myself fortunate to have the one shot where the split skin is visible.

Flash forward to July 3. I noticed the chrysalises were dark so hurried to get the camera ready. When I turned around they had both emerged, too quick for me to catch. Didn't even get a shot of the dark chrysalis. (find a shot from last time)
Before I had my wits about me enough to get sharper pictures, I was able to get this little sequence of rumpled wings expanding.

The female (formerly cat#2)
Didn't get a good shot of top wings and it's too bad, she was quite dusky looking.
However, even from the underside view you can see no hindwing spots.

Slideshow spanning a 9 minute sequence of the last pre-release shots of the male.


Free at last. Resting here after short maiden flights.

More eggs and cats found (add some details, pictures and dates here perhaps)

July 21 I was showing Nancy how the eggs got a little black spot when ready to hatch. Hmm that one looks like it's about ready, I wonder if I could possibly photograph the event. Kluged up Nancy's hand lens and voila.






August 6

Sunday, June 16, 2019

June Birds

June 14, 2019 unless otherwise noted.

The funny-looking wet Chickadee is the one got me started on this session.
I like the vertical raindrops too.

Ms Bluebird

Juvie Bluebird from 1st clutch.

Ms Red-bellied Woodpecker
.
I've read that Cardinals sometimes lose their head feathers, making them look a little like miniature Turkey Vultures. Add some rain and voila!

Rose-breasted Grosbeak.

Ms Bluebird again.

Rose-breasted Grosbeak.

Ms Red-bellied Woodpecker again
.
 Oriole enjoying 1999 vintage Smuckers grape jelly.  
 
I don't get too many Nuthatch shots, they move so quickly. 

June 10
I put out some grape jelly ("best by 1999") in hopes of attracting Orioles. Success with quick result, with a name like Smuckers...! Thanks to Michael Lavender for the suggestion. Young Bluebird and Chickadee also interested. Got a bit carried away with the merged-photo project, not all birds shown are coming for the jelly. Sandy Ridout you asked about the jelly presentation: lid from vitamin bottle.
Customers so far: Oriole, Juvie Bluebird; Chickadee; female Red-belly; Downy.

Jill Swiss: Do you have a bird/wildlife camera set up? This is incredible!

G: Not really, I'd like to get one. With hopes of catching Oriole(s) at jelly I put the GoPro out, snapping shots every second. We had to go out that morning. The goal wasn't to make this big amalgamation out of it but one thing led to another. Putting it together took me at least a couple of hours I think. Thanks!





Saturday, February 9, 2019

Pedal Boards

February 9, 2019 
Genesis Series GSP-500-BK Pedalboard

I'd been getting by with the Electro Harmonix pedal board/bag (bottom of above picture) for a while. However, after damaging the zipper it was a bit cumbersome as the top part could no longer be completely removed (thanks to my repair). Along with a mic stand it took up a fair amount of floor space, so when the Genesis (mid and top of above) went on sale again I jumped at it. Normal price $200, "stupid" deal $100 (excluding the pole which was another $20).

Attaching the Decibel Eleven power block underneath the pedalboard was the first order of business. 


They provide some reasonable clamps for this but the spacing of the back panel is prohibitive, regardless of power block orientation.
Yes I could have flipped the block over with the outlets at the rear (like this) but I wanted the outlets facing the middle of the board dammit, so those short DC wires could reach the pedals. Also I wanted the AC input at the rear. Don't ask why.

I decided to shift that panel down a bit. It wasn't a hard thing to do, just an extra project I hadn't bargained on. I didn't drill/tap any new holes in the sides, just one hole each end of the panel and notches for those edge screws. The above shows the new location, didn't photo the original from this angle but you can see the slots where the screws originally went. Note the picture at top left is diagonally cut off due to rotating it. The side piece slopes but not at such a steep angle.

I don't really trust those clamps, especially as the knurled screws are really hard to turn being recessed between cross-beams as they are. I plan to modify that too.

Success! 

Speaking of pedals and mods: